Who Should Take the First Step Toward Reconciliation?Shalom, Friends! When a relationship is broken, one of the most difficult questions we face is, “Who should make the first move?” Perhaps someone has offended us, betrayed our trust, spoken harshly, or simply withdrawn from the relationship. We may feel justified in waiting for that person to come to us, acknowledge the wrong, and ask for forgiveness. After all, they were the ones who caused the problem. Shouldn't they be responsible for repairing it? That sounds reasonable, but consider the example Yehovah Elohim gave us in the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve had disobeyed His command and broken fellowship with their Creator. They were responsible for what had happened, yet when Yehovah Elohim came into the Garden, He did not wait for them to approach Him. He went to the place where they were hiding. Scripture tells us, “And Yehovah Elohim called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?” (Genesis 3:9). Think about that for a moment. The One who had been wronged was the One who initiated the conversation. He could have demanded that Adam come forward, but instead He called to him and asked questions that gave Adam an opportunity to acknowledge what had happened. Yehovah asked, “Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?” (Genesis 3:11). Yehovah already knew the answers. His questions were not intended to gather information but to bring Adam face-to-face with his responsibility. Reconciliation begins with a willingness to reach out, but restoration requires a willingness to face the truth. We sometimes confuse reconciliation with pretending that nothing happened. We want peace without the uncomfortable conversation, and we want the relationship restored without addressing the behavior that damaged it. But Yehovah did not ignore Adam's disobedience. He confronted it, and there were consequences. Nevertheless, His response did not end with judgment. Scripture tells us, “Unto Adam also and to his wife did Yehovah Elohim make coats of skins, and clothed them.” (Genesis 3:21). This is one of the most beautiful details in the account. Adam and Eve had attempted to cover themselves with fig leaves, but Yehovah Elohim provided something better. He made garments of skins and clothed them Himself. He did not merely express His concern through words. He demonstrated His care by meeting a need they could not adequately meet themselves. Notice the order of His actions. He sought them, questioned them, confronted their wrongdoing, and then clothed them. He did not remove every consequence of their disobedience, but His provision demonstrated that His concern for them had not ended. There is another important lesson in this account that we must not overlook. Although Yehovah Elohim demonstrated His mercy and continuing care for Adam and Eve, He did not permit them to remain in the Garden. “And Yehovah Elohim said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever.” (Genesis 3:22). Scripture then tells us that Yehovah sent them out of the Garden and placed cherubim and a flaming sword to guard the way to the tree of life. Their disobedience had demonstrated the seriousness of their failure to honor the one prohibition Yehovah had given them. He would not permit them to take from the tree of life in their fallen condition. Here we discover an essential distinction between forgiveness and trust. Forgiveness addresses the offense, but trust concerns what responsibility and access can safely be given to someone in the future. Yehovah's provision of clothing demonstrates His mercy even after their disobedience. Yet mercy did not eliminate the consequences of their actions. They could no longer enjoy the same access they had possessed before their disobedience. Forgiveness does not require us to pretend that trust has never been broken. This is especially important in our relationships. We can forgive someone who has betrayed us without immediately placing ourselves in a position where that betrayal can happen again. We can release resentment while still establishing necessary boundaries. We can genuinely desire reconciliation while recognizing that trust must be rebuilt through repentance, changed behavior, and consistent faithfulness. Sometimes people demand that forgiveness include the immediate restoration of every privilege they previously enjoyed, but that is not the example we see in the Garden. Yehovah Elohim continued to care for Adam and Eve, yet He also established a boundary they could not cross. Love can forgive while wisdom establishes boundaries. Mercy can be extended even when trust has not yet been restored. Therefore, when we seek to repair a broken relationship, we must understand that reconciliation is not simply returning everything to the way it was. Sometimes the relationship must be rebuilt on a new foundation of truth, accountability, and demonstrated faithfulness. The person who has been wronged should not use the offense as an excuse to withhold mercy indefinitely. Neither should the person who committed the offense expect trust to be restored merely because forgiveness has been offered. Forgiveness may open the door to reconciliation, but faithfulness is what rebuilds trust. What would happen in our marriages, families, friendships, and fellowships if we followed Yehovah's example? What if, instead of waiting for an apology, we took the initiative to begin a conversation? What if we asked questions intended to bring understanding rather than accusations intended to win an argument? And what if our willingness to forgive was accompanied by some tangible expression of love? Perhaps a phone call, a visit, an offer to help, a meal shared together, or a thoughtful act that communicates, “Although something has come between us, I still care about you.” These simple gestures may accomplish more than lengthy explanations or arguments. They demonstrate that our desire for reconciliation is genuine. This does not mean overlooking wrongdoing, abandoning healthy boundaries, or returning to an unsafe relationship. Nor does it mean that one person can accomplish reconciliation alone. Trust may need to be rebuilt, and genuine repentance may be necessary. Taking the first step does not mean accepting responsibility for someone else's sin. It means accepting responsibility for our own response. Yeshua taught this same principle from two different perspectives. In Matthew 5:23–24, He instructed those who remembered that a brother had something against them to leave their gift at the altar and first seek reconciliation. Yet in Matthew 18:15, He also instructed the person who had been wronged to go privately to the offending brother and address the matter. Whether we have caused the offense or suffered the offense, we are called to pursue reconciliation. Neither person should use the other's responsibility as an excuse for doing nothing. But what happens when we take the initiative, extend forgiveness, and offer reconciliation, only to have the other person refuse? Paul gives us the answer: “If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.” (Romans 12:18). Notice the words, “If it be possible.” Reconciliation requires the willingness of both parties. We can extend forgiveness, demonstrate love, and open the door to restoring a relationship, but we cannot force someone to walk through that door. We are responsible for making a sincere effort toward reconciliation, but we are not responsible for another person's refusal to accept it. When our sincere efforts are rejected, we must guard against allowing disappointment to become bitterness. We can leave the door open without continually exposing ourselves to rejection or mistreatment. Sometimes the most loving thing we can do is step away, continue to pray, and allow Yehovah to work where our efforts cannot. As we consider these things, perhaps each of us should examine our own relationships. Is there someone with whom fellowship has become strained or broken? Have we been waiting for that person to make the first move because we believe they were responsible for the offense? Could it be that Yehovah is calling us to follow His example and reach out? We may not be able to restore the relationship by ourselves, and the other person may not respond as we hope, but we can take the first step without compromising the truth. We can forgive without immediately restoring trust, demonstrate kindness without ignoring wrongdoing, and offer reconciliation without demanding that the other person accept it. Remember the garments of skin. Yehovah Elohim did not simply identify Adam and Eve's wrongdoing and leave them to struggle with the consequences alone. He confronted their disobedience, established necessary boundaries, and still demonstrated His care through a tangible act of love. Sometimes the most powerful expression of reconciliation is not another conversation about what went wrong, but a simple act of kindness that demonstrates love is still present. Don't allow the question, “Who was wrong?” to keep you from asking, “What can I do to make things right?” Yehovah Elohim showed us that love does more than identify what is wrong. Love takes the initiative, speaks the truth, establishes appropriate boundaries, and looks for ways to demonstrate care. Forgiveness is our decision. Reconciliation requires cooperation. Trust must be rebuilt through faithfulness. May we follow His example in all our relationships, remembering that our responsibility is not to control another person's response, but to demonstrate the character of Yehovah in our own. Shalom and blessings, David Mattocks
Light of Yeshua Fellowship Real Truth. Real People.
|
